Hello, This thread speaks of using 0.3mm thermal vias in the pads of DPAK power FETs…
We have 12 vias equally spaced under the drain pad of the DPAK
…we have now tried this, and unfortunately some (not all) of our PCBs come back from the PCB assembly factory with sharp “shards” of solder protruding out of the bottom of the thermal vias.
This is disastrous, as it pierces the thermal rubber pad that the PCB sits on, and contacts with the earthed heatsink.
Some organisations speak of putting solder resist on the bottom copper layer, with an opening just wider than the thermal via opening. I wonder if this will solve our problem?
Alternatively, I wonder if we should just add solder resist over the entire bottom copper, so that the bottom of the thermal vias is covered up, and might stop solder from leaking out?
I wonder if using leaded solder would also help solve the problem?
I also wonder whether the solder bath of the reflow oven was too hot? Also, I deeply suspect that just maybe the DPAK FETs were actually hand soldered on, because of the difficulty in getting the reflow solder bath the right temperature for all the 0402 resistors, and also the big DPAK FETs. As such, the hand solderers (if they were hand soldered, we don’t know) might have been responsible for the protruding solder?
-Maybe its just impossible to get the reflow solder bath the right temperature for a board which contains both ‘teeny’ tiny 0402 resistors, and also ‘big’ DPAK FETs?
- Comments(1)
A****min
Jul 02.2019, 17:58:51
Solder resist as a via plug is not reliable. Usually 90% or more 0.3mm vias can be plugged successfully. Get a larger via that capillary force is not that dominant compared with the surface tension, so solder leaked through the vias will flat out and lay down rather than erect and pierce your insulation material.