PCBgogo

Electronic Project Engineer's Best Partner!
Issues When Using FR4 as PCB Material
1704 0 Dec 20.2013, 17:14:00

label: PCB Material,printed circuit board

It might not be surprising that much of the testing at the UNH-IOL is performed using custom software written in various languages/programs by our employees. However, what many dont know is that we also design and make custom test hardware. We design platforms that streamline testing or offer unique capabilities, and we also design test jigs to connect our test equipment with devices under test. In this post, well focus on one of our test jigs to provide background on compensating for loss introduced by FR4 material relevant to testing data communications products.

All of our test jigs are made of FR4 material, which can introduce considerable loss on technologies that operate near or above 1GHz. The importance of insertion loss can be seen even at relatively low speeds such as 1000BASE-T, which operates around 125MHz. For 1000BASE-T physical media attachment (PMA) testing (IEEE 802.3 Clause 40), we use a test jig that converts an Ethernet jack to SMA connectors, allowing us to test a 1000Base-T transmitter on an oscilloscope. In order to correlate our measurements of this signaling to those of implementers and other labs, we had to characterize the loss of the 1000Base-T PMA test jig. This loss was found by measuring the differential insertion loss using a network analyzer and despite the short length of trace used and good engineering practices held in the design, the loss was over 0.5dB. This amount of loss is more than enough to cause miscommunication between engineers at two different laboratories and slow any attempts to correct the underlying issues. In this example, the differential insertion loss was found between 300 KHz and 200 MHz and the loss we measured is now applied during the post-processing of measurements to eliminate the effects of the jig.

We have also begun experimenting with using Rogers (RO4350B) material in some of our test jigs as we need a better PCB material than FR4 to accommodate testing new high speed technologies. Rogers material offers a lower dielectric constant (3.66 versus FR4s 4.5) and lower loss than FR4 which will allow us to continue to create high quality test jigs and boards here at the UNH-IOL.

Prev: What PCB material do I need to use for RF?
Next:The Core Power of Modern PCB Design
  • Comments(0)
Upload a photo:You can only upload 1 files in total. Each file cannot exceed 2MB.Supports JPG, JPEG, GIF, PNG, BMP
Browse
Submit